[This page is definitely not up to date.]

Talks, Panels, and Lectures

1. Mühlberg, J. T. (2022). “Sustainable Security: What do we sustain, and for whom?” Keynote talk at DATE 2022, W09: Sustainability in Security, Security for Sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.beetzsee.de/posts/talks/20220318-date-w9-sustainable-security.pdf
   BibTeX

   @misc{muehlberg_2022datew9_sustainable_sec,
     title = {Sustainable Security: What do we sustain, and for whom?},
     author = {M{\"u}hlberg, Jan Tobias},
     year = {2022},
     booktitle = {Keynote talk at DATE 2022, W09: Sustainability in Security, Security for
       Sustainability},
     url = {https://www.beetzsee.de/posts/talks/20220318-date-w9-sustainable-security.pdf},
     abstrat = {The term "sustainability" has become an advertising buzzword recently,
     often being used as a synonym for efficiency or profitability, and
     sometimes meaning that a product or service is good for people and planet.
     In the ICT sector, a customer might expect a sustainable product to be
     developed without child labour, while the producer uses the term to signify
     that their new devices use marginally less power than the previous
     generation. Even in research on sustainable ICT, these different notions of
     terminology are prevalent. As researchers we often work towards optimising
     our subject of study towards one specific sustainability metric -- let's
     say energy consumption -- while being blissfully unaware of, e.g.,
     life-cycle impacts or rebound effects of such optimisations.
     
     In this talk I want to dissect the idea of "sustainable security," starting
     from the questions of what we want to sustain, and for whom we want to
     sustain it. I believe that a general "people and planet" answer is
     inadequate here because this form of sustainability cannot be the property
     of a single industry sector but must be addressed by society as a whole.
     However, with sufficient understanding of the life-cycle impacts of our
     sector we may very well be able to devise research and development efforts,
     and inform decision making processes towards the use of security solutions
     that help us to solve societal challenges in the context of the climate and
     ecological crises, and that are aligned with concepts such as
     intersectionality and climate justice.}
   }
   

2. Crepax, T., & Mühlberg, J. T. (2021). “I used to be bad at Tetris, and now I can’t get a mortgage! On Assessing Privacy Risks in Online Games for Children.” 10th annual Symposium Ethics in the Age of Smart Systems. Retrieved from https://www.beetzsee.de/posts/2021/04/19/ai4s-privacy-in-games.html
   BibTeX

   @misc{crepax_2021ai4s_privacy_in_games,
     title = {I used to be bad at {T}etris, and now {I} can't get a mortgage!
     {O}n Assessing Privacy Risks in Online Games for Children},
     author = {Crepax, Tommaso and M{\"u}hlberg, Jan Tobias},
     year = {2021},
     booktitle = {10th annual Symposium Ethics in the Age of Smart Systems},
     url = {https://www.beetzsee.de/posts/2021/04/19/ai4s-privacy-in-games.html}
   }
   

3. Molnar, P., & Mühlberg, J. T. (2021). “Technological Testing Grounds: Migration Management Experiments in the Age of COVID-19.” 10th annual Symposium Ethics in the Age of Smart Systems. Retrieved from https://www.beetzsee.de/posts/2021/04/19/ai4s-tech-testing-grounds.html
   BibTeX

   @misc{molnar_2021ai4s_tech_testing_grounds,
     title = {Technological Testing Grounds: Migration Management Experiments
     in the Age of {COVID-19}},
     author = {Molnar, Petra and M{\"u}hlberg, Jan Tobias},
     year = {2021},
     booktitle = {10th annual Symposium Ethics in the Age of Smart Systems},
     url = {https://www.beetzsee.de/posts/2021/04/19/ai4s-tech-testing-grounds.html}
   }
   

4. Mühlberg, J. T. (2020). “Trusted Execution and how far you can trust it.” CIF Seminar, KU Leuven. Retrieved from https://www.beetzsee.de/posts/talks/20200207-cif-trusted-computing.pdf
   BibTeX

   @misc{muehlber_2020cif_trusted_computing,
     title = {{Tr}usted {E}xecution and how far you can trust it},
     author = {M{\"u}hlberg, Jan Tobias},
     year = {2020},
     booktitle = {CIF Seminar, KU Leuven.},
     url = {https://www.beetzsee.de/posts/talks/20200207-cif-trusted-computing.pdf}
   }
   

5. Mühlberg, J. T. (2019). “Defining Environmental Sustainability in ICT.” Keynote talk at QA&Test 2019, Bilbao, Spain. Retrieved from https://www.beetzsee.de/posts/talks/20191029-qatest-sustainable-ict.pdf
   BibTeX

   @misc{muehlber_2019qatest_sustainable_ict,
     title = {Defining Environmental Sustainability in {ICT}},
     author = {M{\"u}hlberg, Jan Tobias},
     year = {2019},
     booktitle = {Keynote talk at QA\&Test 2019, Bilbao, Spain},
     url = {https://www.beetzsee.de/posts/talks/20191029-qatest-sustainable-ict.pdf},
     abstrat = { Environmental sustainability in the Information and Communication Industry
     isn't a very prominent topic. Beyond solar-powered cloud computing and web
     hosting, modular and repair-friendly smartphones as niche products, and the
     occasional reporting on the perils of electronic waste downcycling, most of
     us rarely hear about the environmental impact of ICT or the existence of
     "green" initiatives in our field. Yet, the footprint of the industry is
     huge. It encompasses the environmental impact of mining and refining raw
     materials, the production of ICT products including hardware, software and
     services, the use of these products, and finally their decommissioning and
     disposal after an often rather short lifespan. No labels or certificates
     exist that evaluate the entire life-cycle of an ICT product with respect to
     environmental and social sustainability metrics, and little research has
     been done in defining such metrics. Yet, our use and dependence on ICT
     products is growing, in the western world as much as in developing nations.
     In this talk I want to share ideas on defining sustainability metrics and
     performance indicators for ICT projects, covering resource consumption in
     general and during the entire system life-cycle, even waste management and
     social impact. This set of indicators can be used to draw the environmental
     profile of a product or to derive a sustainability value model for an
     institution, which would environmental sustainability more broadly in
     management or marketing. The talk does not aim to improve your readiness for
     certification under a specific label. Instead, it aims to spark discussion
     around sustainable ICT products and the reduction of our environmental
     impact.}
   }
   

6. Mühlberg, J. T., Noorman, J., & Piessens, F. (2015). Lightweight and Flexible Trust Assessment Modules for the Internet of Things. Invited talk at QA&Test 2015, Bilbao, Spain.
   BibTeX

   @misc{muehlberg_sancus_ta_qatest_2015,
     title = {Lightweight and Flexible Trust Assessment 
      Modules for the {I}nternet of {T}hings},
     author = {M{\"u}hlberg, Jan Tobias and Noorman, Job and Piessens, Frank},
     year = {2015},
     booktitle = {Invited talk at QA\&Test 2015, Bilbao, Spain.}
   }
   

7. Mühlberg, J. T., & Freitas, L. (2011). Combining Formal Methods and Testing: A Case Study on FreeRTOS. Invited talk at QA&Test 2011, Bilbao, Spain.
   BibTeX

   @misc{muehlberg_freertos_qatest_2011,
     title = {Combining Formal Methods and Testing: A Case Study on FreeRTOS},
     author = {M{\"u}hlberg, Jan Tobias and Freitas, Leo},
     year = {2011},
     booktitle = {Invited talk at QA\&Test 2011, Bilbao, Spain.}
   }
   

8. Mühlberg, J. T. (2011, May). A Quick Tour of the VeriFast Program Verifier.
   BibTeX

   @misc{muehlberg_verifast_quick_tour_newcastle,
     title = {A Quick Tour of the {V}eri{F}ast Program Verifier},
     author = {M{\"u}hlberg, Jan Tobias},
     year = {2011},
     month = may,
     note = {Talk at a Departmental Seminar of the School of Computing,
       Newcastle University, UK.}
   }
   

---

Last modified: 2022-11-14 14:33:30 +0100